Me.
C. 0.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
HONGKONG.
SUMMARY JURISDICTION.
SUTE No. 1.2 of 1882.
PLAINTIFFS
Lan Sherg
DEFENDANT
Summi
(Copy)
5.901
Opiction of the Altonicy - General.
185
I am of opinion that the position
taken up by the Consel in his letters of
Jan
Jammary cannot be admitted.
the
20th and 233
aud
I do not think there is
cidernational usa
JUDGE'S SUMMONS. for delivery to plaintiffs of certain
or certam moneys the
This Summons is issued under "The Supres Court Summary Jurisdiction Ordinance, 187 and Section XLV of The Hongkong Cole Civil Procedure."
Motton
звеа сън Attorney for Maut
-
any
usage according
faus
to which the
Consul could elainu exemption from the
ordinary process of the Court executed in || the
ordinary way as in the case here
complained of,
con veution or
own
nor do I know of any
arrangement between our Government and the Geriau Gvcramery
under which
any special stativ apert
from what the ordinary rectes of law.
and international
fae
usage would giv been greeted to Teman Convuls in British Porte
Speaking broadly (subject to certain
special exceptions not here in point) Convel
HONGKONG
Cannot
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.